The Smiths

Not in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame

Eligible since: 2008 (The 2009 Induction Ceremony)

Nominated in: 2015   2016   

Previously Considered? Yes  what's this?


Inducted into Rock Hall Revisited in 2009 (ranked #87) .


Essential Albums (?)WikipediaAmazon MP3Amazon CD
The Smiths (1984)
Meat Is Murder (1985)
The Queen is Dead (1986)
Strangeways, Here We Come (1987)

Essential Songs (?)WikipediaAmazon MP3YouTube
This Charming Man (1983)
How Soon is Now? (1984)
Heaven Knows I'm Miserable Now (1984)
What Difference Does It Make? (1984)
There Is A Light That Never Goes Out (1986)
I Know It's Over (1986)
Bigmouth Strikes Again (1986)
Panic (1986)

The Smiths @ Wikipedia

The Smiths Videos

Will The Smiths be inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame?
"Musical excellence is the essential qualification for induction."
   

Comments

79 comments so far (post your own)

I hope there's not a bias against bands that were not popular in the US. However, the Smiths were very important in Europe and elsewhere around the world. The Smiths most certainly belong with the strange mesh of Morrissey's excellent lyrics and the amazing melodies provided by Johnny Marr. If all of the members show for the ceremony, it will probably make a more awkward scene than Blondie last year, as all the lawsuits about percentages between Mike Joyce and the others. All in all, though, it would be a travesty if they did not get inducted.

Posted by Ryan on Sunday, 09.10.06 @ 18:27pm


The Smiths are, in my opinion, among rock's unsung heroes. They deserve way more recognition than they get.

Posted by Mike on Friday, 12.1.06 @ 13:37pm


The Smiths were regarded well critically and their influence can definitely be heard in any number of emo and indie bands out there. Both Morrissey and Marr are spoken in reverential terms by fans and critics. They had only respectable sales in America, however, and that might not be enough to get them in on the first try. They were largely a college radio act in America during their existence. They will have in their favor that several acts (U2, REM, Patti Smith) that were college radio acts for at the least the beginning of their careers will likely be in (U2 is there already). Don't know if they have enough clout with voters to get in on the first try, however.

Posted by TJWood59 on Wednesday, 12.20.06 @ 23:40pm


They're shoe-ins, don't worry. Put "How Soon Is Now" on the nominees disc and every ballot will have their box checked.

Posted by Casper on Wednesday, 01.10.07 @ 04:54am


The Smiths were titans. This year marks the 20th anniverary of their break up, and,if anything they've only grown in prominence, standing and influence among rock's cognesceti. And rightly so. Just like The Beatles, The Kinks and The Who, The Smiths were true British originals. And just like those three bands, The Smiths have influenced countless others. Like The Clash, The Smiths were around just five years and, like The Clash, their body of work is largely perfect. Out of their some 95 songs, The Smiths only delivered a handful of klunkers. Everything was very good; much of it was truly great. Their sound crossed a lot of categories; it's far too simplistic to say they were "emo" or "indie" originals. They were interesting. The lyrics were tragic-comic; the guitar always melodic. Not since Lennon/McCartney has a been operated as a singles band; no one commanded the 2:30 single like The Smiths. Pop. Orchestral pop. Hard-edged post-punk. "Psycodelia". The Smiths did it all, and brilliantly. Morrissey and Marr were a brilliant combination who were far better and -- again -- more interesting than other partnerhsips of their era, namely Bono and The Edge. They were far more witty, more melodic and, yes, better vocally. The Smiths belong in the pantheon of rock/pop acts. Ian Keller

Posted by Ian Keller on Tuesday, 01.16.07 @ 12:26pm


Can anyone imagine the pandamonium created by a potential combination of Morrissey/Marr at the induction ceremony belting out "There is a Light that Never goes out"? It would be mystical....

Posted by Chris on Tuesday, 01.16.07 @ 18:40pm


in my opinion the smiths are an automatic inductee and i find it strange that it is even a question that needs to be pondered by anyone. i might be a bit biased, since they are hands down my favorite band, but seriously they were a brilliant band and they influenced generations of bands. just the thought of morrissey being on the same stage as mike joyce is too juicy. how awkward, if there is a god, it must happen!

Posted by bob c on Wednesday, 01.17.07 @ 13:21pm


smiths deserve anything this country has to offer in terms of recognition, awards, merits and what nots. As far as music world is concerned, smiths left an indelible mark on how to write lyrics, compose melodies and produce fan love in a way that nobody ever did in english music and in the world. Their body of work overshadows and is superior to almost any other band. what they have done is intrinsic, directly and inderectly, to any other english rock band, apart for electronic music.
They are one of the greatest achievments of human collaboration and human art production.
'...oh well, enough said'.


Posted by stefano on Thursday, 01.18.07 @ 03:38am


the smiths should and must be inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. their music is still felt in so many indie bands today ... most of which state themselves the inclusion of smiths influence into their music genre, so many popular bands to mention. morrissey, marr, rourke & joyce were the good smiths we constantly play on our mp3 players to date after 20 wholly years!!

i would add, may this 'historical' event help in the reuniting of 4 great musical heroes ...

'please, please, please, let me get what i want ..'

Posted by mozzer (malta) on Friday, 01.19.07 @ 02:10am


Every teenager should be well-versed in The Smiths. They wrote your life before you could live it.

Don't think Morissey would be very fond of any reunion plans. I believe he is on record as saying "I would rather cut off and eat my own balls than reunite The Smiths, and that's pretty strong language coming from a vegetarian."

Morissey always was a lively quote.

Posted by Kit on Friday, 01.26.07 @ 19:50pm


I'm sure Morrissey would consider it a great insult being invited to a "hall of fame"

See his opinions on Live Aid if you don't agree

This is exactly the sort of thing the Smiths were against, frankly.

Posted by Dave on Friday, 02.9.07 @ 07:34am


The smiths should get in but for us fans we could care less. Getting into the hall is like winning an oscar (who really cares?) They're one of the greatest bands ever with the greatest guitarist ever. The real question is: will they reunite and play together for the induction?! C'mon morrissey, C'mon Marr! You guys can do it!!!

Posted by Ryan on Monday, 02.19.07 @ 11:15am


The Smiths should be in. Innovation and Influence are two things that they shine with...
Just about any Emo band and many bands that are huge today adored and idolised The Smiths...

Posted by King Leer on Tuesday, 03.13.07 @ 14:58pm


THE SMITHS THE BEST OF THE BEST

Posted by KEN on Wednesday, 03.14.07 @ 08:14am


The Smiths should have already been inducted! They are an innovative and creative musical expirence that should not be overlooked. In addition, The Smiths were a fighting force in devloping and bringing indie rock to a broader audience. Marr's guitar parts are anything but dull. Joyce's drum lines are enticing compared to many modern drummers, Rouke's moving bass lines are purely intelluctal and Morrissey's vocals are unparralled. the Smiths are endeed worthy of enduction.

Posted by boysdontcry67 on Thursday, 03.22.07 @ 17:56pm


This is probably the only act eligible this year that will get in on the first go. Their innovation and influence are undeniable. Then only things that might work against them are:

1) Not being a household name in the US (the Hall seems to have a bias against such acts)

and

2) The fact that Morrissey and Johnny Marr are pretty much not on speaking terms probably eliminates a performance or even an attendance at the ceremony.

Posted by NFB on Wednesday, 04.4.07 @ 10:17am


Truly , the only unique, never aging, sound that came from the nineteen hate-ees!

Posted by ruben on Thursday, 04.26.07 @ 22:42pm


There is not a snowballs chance in hell that they'll reform for this show. I would LOVE to see them reform and would personally go into massive debt just to see them play live again just once but its just not gonna happen. Joyce ruined everything.

Posted by Truculant on Saturday, 04.28.07 @ 15:57pm


The Smiths were a great band and should be in the hall. I do believe that they were very influential in rock music

Posted by Anonymous on Sunday, 05.6.07 @ 11:54am


The Smiths should be a lock. If innovation, influence and artistry are truly the backbone of the election process then there's really no way to keep them out.

Posted by Nicky on Thursday, 07.12.07 @ 09:49am


quite simply put this is one of the most infleuntial bands EVER.

Influence = DEFINITELY

hmm, innovation? well, theyre marked as a turning point in music and the most important indie band of the 80s, as heard in the late 80s/early 90s britpop movement.

but still, they may be too English to get in.

All we can work out is that if the Smiths DO get in, the likes of Oasis have a higher chance of getting in

Posted by liam on Friday, 08.31.07 @ 11:32am


list of artists influenced by the smith:

Oasis
Blur
Radiohead
Stone Roses
Happy Mondays
The Libertines
Babyshambles
Kaiser Chiefs
Arctic Monkeys
Pulp
The Killers
Muse
The Ordinary Boys
The Cinematics
MCR (hate them)
Panic! (hate them too)

and more that i cant think of atm

fill the list if u want


Posted by liam on Wednesday, 09.5.07 @ 13:23pm


It would boggle the mind if The Smiths didn't make it in. Take this from a guy who grew up on Mowtown and rap music.

Posted by Lance on Sunday, 09.9.07 @ 04:09am


Dude, nobody born in the US before 1960 cares about the Smiths. I should note that I don't think they deserve to get in - it would take me pages to explain why. Still, I think if they ever do get in it won't be for at least 7 or 8 years, or when the nominating commitee is comprised of people young enough to have felt their influence. Oh, and RUN-DMC are a lock - if not for 2008 then certainly by 2009 - no matter what this site predicts.

Posted by Ben on Tuesday, 09.11.07 @ 14:31pm


Ben, what the Fuck do you know about the Smiths?
Run-DMC for chrissake?! yes, they had their moments. I'd really like you to use those pages you said you'd have to use, just so i can prove how much bull shit is coming out of your mouth.

"nobody born in the US before 1960 cares about the Smiths"

oh well its nice to see you're speaking on everyone elses part. I'm sure somebody born in 59 is a fan.

"I think if they ever do get in it won't be for at least 7 or 8 years"

yes, that's why they're already on the list of 500 most important songs, or whatever its called.

Well Done, you've basically just messed about with one of the most important bands ever.

Posted by liam on Wednesday, 09.12.07 @ 13:55pm


"Morissey always was a lively quote."

My favorite is:

"God bless Noel [Gallagher]; I'm sure he'll always have a spot on 'Bob's Full House'"

Posted by liam on Saturday, 09.22.07 @ 14:10pm


Born in 1958 and proudly proclaim myself a fan of the Smiths. I doubt if they will get voted in their first year, but they will get there. How great would it be if they get in the sametime as the NY Dolls, one of Morrissey's biggest influences.

Posted by Dameon on Saturday, 11.24.07 @ 18:33pm


Maybe Brandon Flowers can do some good for music (hint hint...)

Posted by liam on Sunday, 12.16.07 @ 07:28am


I think they are one of the more important bands out there that needs to be inducted mainly for their influence on rock music.

Posted by Matzo Ball on Thursday, 12.27.07 @ 17:13pm


Absolutely no chance at first induction. If they were to be nominated, they would be giving us a foot-in-the-door to push the late 70s/all 80s alternative groups (I'm thinking of Joy Division, The Cure, Replacements, GoF, New Order etc.) into the Hall.

It'll probably take the bigger-selling 80s groups to get in (most of whom deserve it less) before The Smiths even have a chance (such as Depeche Mode and The Cure).

And ofcourse, this all goes with the assumption that the Hall wants anything to do with alternative at all.

Posted by Liam on Saturday, 03.8.08 @ 09:50am


If the Smiths don't get in... the RRHF should just shut down!!! It's bad enough, that The Cure, INXS and Joy Divison didn't get in, but if The Smiths get snubbed that would be the ULTIMATE travesty ever, by far the pioneers of brit rock and "modern" rock such a great influence!!!!!!!!!

Anyway, i'll save the argument for next year, hopefully this is a mute point!!!

Posted by Rickey on Saturday, 03.15.08 @ 08:35am


For my money, Joy Division is the true link between punk & new wave, which is pretty significant considering the popularity of both. They should go in first.

Posted by Terry on Saturday, 03.15.08 @ 09:26am


The Smiths should be able to get in based on huge universal acclaim on their 4 albums and their influence on so many whos who of alternative bands

Posted by timmay on Saturday, 03.29.08 @ 21:17pm


Great Great band!! Stated by the fact that there are no unreleased Smiths songs.Everything they wrote was tremendous. Even tho only together 5 years their music just continues to sell. Morrissey and MArr are truly one of the greatest writing partnerships ever. They should be shoe-ins but with the Hall you never know....see the Replacements and the JAM.

Posted by Kevin on Tuesday, 04.1.08 @ 15:25pm


I said yes, although I'm unsure of it. Why? Because the RnRHoF are snobs.

Besides, Morrissey wouldn never show up to the ceremony. :oP

Posted by aquadonia on Wednesday, 05.7.08 @ 03:21am


It just bloody annoys me how Madonna gets in there when she was nothing but a sexualised pop-diva but The Smiths can't get in. Morrissey wrote some of the greatest lyrics ever and they go so deep and Marr just wrote the most amazing and beautiful tunes of the eighties and yet they are brushed aside for Madonna. I can't imagine teen-age life without the Smiths and I am 15. The Smiths inlfuenced and were a spokesband for generations of people, losers, loners and the popular. What did Madonna do though, she taught girls to dress like sluts and now girls are often just stupid except for a few of course. Without the Smiths, Oasis, the Verve, Radiohead and The Killers would be non-existant. They have got my vote and have for ages.

Posted by steve on Friday, 05.16.08 @ 23:51pm


The Smiths have to be inducted. they are the most influential band to come out of the 80's. Their music has meaning and depth. They deserve it more than most of the band that have already been inducted.

Posted by Amanda on Tuesday, 05.27.08 @ 12:09pm


Their music has meaning and depth. - Amanda

What does this exactly mean? But I do agree, I think they should and will be inducted one day in the future.

Posted by Dameon on Tuesday, 05.27.08 @ 15:17pm


I don't see any real argument for them being considered THE most influential '80s group. They're up there for sure, but the likes of R.E.M. and Husker Du pip them to the post.

Posted by Liam on Wednesday, 05.28.08 @ 04:52am


Quality alone should give them strong consideration. I would say Johnny Marr is clearly the best post-punk, non-virtuoso guitarist. The abusrdity of Morrisey's lyrics combined with Marr's beautiful song structures is something we've never heard before or since.

Posted by Stephen C. Salinas on Saturday, 06.28.08 @ 23:35pm


If you're a true Smiths fan you wouldn't want them in the hall anyways

Posted by Mr. Shankly on Thursday, 07.24.08 @ 11:36am


The smiths, despite being not hard rock or "heavy", have even influenced heavy metal bands for gods sakes. Phil Anselmo of Pantera plus System of a Down have both mentioned The Smiths as a major influence. How a british alternative 80's band influenced 2 heavy metal bands, hmmm... GREAT MUSIC and GREAT INFLUENCE!

Posted by smithsfan on Saturday, 08.9.08 @ 09:18am


Can't argue with The Smiths

Posted by Dameon on Saturday, 08.9.08 @ 10:23am


If the HoF has the slightest sense of realism, they should at least be nominated this year, but no, Bon Jovi are more important...

Posted by denyo on Wednesday, 08.27.08 @ 15:33pm


The Hall of Fame are just a bunch of people from the United States of America, do you actually think they are capable of making decisions and ending up with good choices. Reasons why the Smiths should be inducted, hmmm...? Maybe because they are the only band with a close to perfect repetoire and they have one of the greatest lyricists of all time, maybe because they have one of the greatest guitarists of all time and maybe because when those two got together they wrote some of the greatest songs of all time. All fact not fiction by the way. Maybe because even though they are an English Indie band, they somehow still managed to influence Pantera and System of a Down, two heavy metal bands. They also influenced The Killers, No Doubt and Blink 182. Arctic Monkeys, Radiohead, The Verve, Oasis... For gods sakes Marrs music is way more complex and articulated than anything McCartney and Lennon wrote, fact not fiction. They are also one of the most innovative bands with "How Soon is Now?" Fact not Fiction.

Posted by anothersmithsfan on Tuesday, 10.21.08 @ 17:33pm


anothersmithsfan wrote:
The Maybe because they are the only band with a close to perfect repetoire and they have one of the greatest lyricists of all time, maybe because they have one of the greatest guitarists of all time and maybe because when those two got together they wrote some of the greatest songs of all time. All fact not fiction by the way. Maybe because even sis... For gods sakes Marrs music is way more complex and articulated than anything McCartney and Lennon wrote, fact not fiction.

They are also one of the most innovative bands
with "How Soon is Now?" Fact not Fiction.
Tuesday, 10.21.08 @ 17:33pm


LOL now that is to funny,,What planet are you on? Also check your orbit.. George Martin.. is light years in front of the Smiths.They are good but please, please GET REAL.!!!!!! John Poter or any of the Smiths are no George Martin..


Posted by mrxyz on Tuesday, 10.21.08 @ 20:41pm


anothersmithsfan...no fact, just opinion (and not one shared by most).How is "How Soon Is Now" so innovative? Ever listen to "Crimson & Clover"...recorded about 25 years earlier?

Where do you people come up with this stuff?? It's okay to be a fan of a group but be real!!!!

Posted by Gitarzan on Tuesday, 10.21.08 @ 21:03pm


(First, if all The Smiths did was pave the way for Emo, they should be cast into the fires of hell. Fortunately this isn't the case. Despite Emo bands voicing approval of them and writing occasionally..."witty"...lyrics, it isn't a by-product of The Smiths.)

A definite "Yes".

Barring New Order, no one else conjured up albums and singles the way they did in the eighties. Morrissey and Marr were the Jagger/Richards of 1980s alternative music; their songwriting partnership hasn't been paralleled by any other British act since. They are the rock that most post-1980s British rock music is built on.

If the rock hall is serious, The Smiths will get in.

Posted by Jonas on Tuesday, 12.16.08 @ 03:29am


Hey Gitarzan, that "Crimson and Clover" is a pretty good song but "How Soon Is Now" is totally different because not even Marr himself has been able to re-duplicate what he did on "How Soon Is Now", whereas in "Crimson and Clover" all they have done is used an effect pedal with basic chords. The whole "How Soon Is Now" song is very unique, not just the constant chord that is played, and the melody is original. Ahhh mrxyz, what are you talking about? How has George Martin or John Poter got anything to do with this? I didn't even mention them. Seriously what are you on about?

Posted by someone on Thursday, 01.8.09 @ 00:18am


The rock and roll hall of fame is an institution. 'You've earned your right to enter this club'. You have to have been very famous and have sold lots of records. It is not about music itself it is for fame and mainstream conformism. I would hate to see the Smiths accept inclusion into the hall of 'fame'. What is the point of this club? as though you know that you have finally made it because you can now mingle equally among the likes of bono?

Posted by Patrick on Sunday, 02.1.09 @ 18:20pm


"You have to have been very famous and have sold lots of records. It is not about music itself it is for fame and mainstream conformism."

I strongly advise you to go to the boards for Chicago, Journey and KISS to hear exact opposite sounds. It's not a recognition of your fame, but of your impact on music. If it really was only for the famous, the mainstream and the conformists, Patti Smith would never have made it. The Smiths will get in, I'm sure. Considering their influence on locks like Oasis and Coldplay, it would be difficult keeping them out.

Posted by The_Claw on Monday, 02.2.09 @ 03:45am


Another example of the Hall bias against the most influential British bands. If the Smiths and Roxy Music can't get in - what is the use of the American Rockhall?

Posted by M Rourke on Sunday, 05.3.09 @ 21:04pm


How is the Hall prejudiced against British Bands when they have inducted more than half of the whole British Invasion. I agree with you that Roxy Music, The Smiths and several other Brit bands need to receive their just due with the Hall a/s/a/p. But so do many other bands from America as well.

Posted by Dameon on Monday, 05.4.09 @ 09:32am


It pisses me off how the Rock Hall bases their winners on album sales at all. Any respectable rock star knows that it is about the music.

Posted by someone on Tuesday, 09.15.09 @ 03:20am


Greatest band of the last 30 years! Morrissey = genius!

Posted by Steven Patrick on Wednesday, 10.28.09 @ 15:28pm


The Smiths seem to be a slam dunk. They were original and left fans wanting more. The music hasn't become dated. It will be more interesting to see if Morrissey will be inducted as a solo artist.

As far as "How Soon is Now?" - Marr cited 3 songs that influence it, one, Can's "I Want More" is a dead ringer, at the start especially. Doesn't take anything away IMO, Marr expanded on it and took it to a new level.

Posted by Now is Now on Wednesday, 12.16.09 @ 11:58am


Absolutely. I'm not that big a fan, but if there's any doubt in your mind watch Episode 7 of the BBC's Seven Ages of Rock (the British Indie section.) They defined indie by being allowed to work without interference. They decided what artwork would be used, they decided what songs would be the singles. The Madchester scene probably wouldn't have existed without the groundwork the Smiths laid, and Noel Gallagher has said without The Stone Roses (leaders of Madchester) there wouldn't have been Oasis. It may take a while but they will get in; they are, in fact, critically acclaimed in the U.S. as well.

Posted by Sam on Friday, 02.5.10 @ 17:01pm


Morrissey's lyrics alone make them deserve the honor.

Hopefully they can break through with a nomination soon.

Posted by Matt Love on Monday, 03.22.10 @ 18:46pm


The Smiths are the only band that matters. They have 1 not so good song out of their whole playlist..and its not even their own song, its a cover! Every single song is witty and beautiful, not to mention they had the most talented and musically gifted band backing the greatest lyricist ever. They were able to be one of the most influential bands without ever becoming sell outs and in such a short time. They are absolutely timeless. Now..if they would ever be in the same room with each other again..yeah its doubtful.

Posted by Kelly on Thursday, 04.29.10 @ 10:13am


I'm a bit worried. Two years without even being considered. If they go without being nominated this year I'll be confused. If they're not even considered this year then... I guess I'll be angry.

Posted by Sam on Thursday, 04.29.10 @ 18:55pm


The Smiths aren't my favorite band (Oasis are), so I'm not biased. However,the Smiths are within my top 5 favorite bands, easily.

The fact that they aren't in the Hall of Fame is a joke. I won't give the Rock N Roll Hall of Fame any credit until they induct the Smiths, and Oasis (when they qualify). To ignore both bands is just ignorance.

The Smiths deserve to be in there. Unbelievable.

Posted by Joe the Plumber on Sunday, 07.18.10 @ 23:00pm


I'm actually not that fond of The Smiths. I recognize they're good at what they do, but Morrissey just goes over my head a lot of times (I wasn't around back then and I'm from a different bit of the UK.) Like Joe there, I like Oasis. Having said that, there probably wouldn't be an Oasis without The Smiths, who are undeniably one of the most influential bands of the last 30 years. Perhaps they'll be inducted this year (I hope so, because The Stone Roses and Happy Mondays stand no chance.) Many of The Smiths' contemporaries deserve induction as well, Joe the Plumber: New Order, Joy Division, The Cure, Gang of Four... that's just for starters. Inexcusable snubs, and at least two of them should've been inducted by now. Check out those bands if you're not familiar with them (and I'd put The Smiths either last or fourth in line as far as being in conversation with those bands.)

Posted by Sam on Monday, 07.19.10 @ 20:36pm


I simply cannot stand Morrissey as an individual but i have to admit that Johnny Marr is one hell of a guitarist. The Smiths deserve a nod based on his fine work alone. Also the fact that they stopped while they were ahead, there is something about a band that knows when to call it quits and not fall into mediocrity 10 years or so down the line (U2, REM, Cure). As for whether or not they will be inducted, its hard to say but i do agree that their lack of big chart success in the US may hurt their chances, also i'm not sure if people will agree (and if you dont, please dont go apeshit on me) but like Blur, maybe they were a bit too British sounding?

Posted by Paul on Thursday, 11.11.10 @ 19:38pm


"but like Blur, maybe they were a bit too British sounding?"

Yes, I'd agree with that. I'm not a huge fan but yes they should definitely get in, though they probably won't.

Posted by Sam on Tuesday, 11.16.10 @ 06:46am


The Smiths were as important a voice to young people of the 80's as The Stones, Beatles or Kinks were in the 60's and 70's. The Marr and Morrissey duo should be remembered as one of rock n roll's best singer/songwriter partnerships and the combination of Morrissey's on stage charisma and Marr's guitar genius can't be denied. Clearly the best testiment to their importance though is the fact that both are still an influence to new songwriters/musicians and both still make contributions to the industry through solo work or band membership. They deserve to be in the Hall of Fame.

Posted by hopkins on Monday, 01.10.11 @ 12:58pm


LOL now that is to funny,,What planet are you on? Also check your orbit.. George Martin.. is light years in front of the Smiths.They are good but please, please GET REAL.!!!!!! John Poter or any of the Smiths are no George Martin..

Posted by mrxyz on Tuesday, 10.21.08 @ 20:41pm

How did George Martin pop in here?

Posted by Tahvo Parvianen on Sunday, 03.27.11 @ 07:31am


Yes! I could have not said it any better hopkins!

Posted by Brian on Saturday, 04.2.11 @ 01:38am


The only thing to be said to these idiots who choose the inductees is,
"How can you constantly contemplate when there's no debate?"

Posted by Hania on Wednesday, 04.27.11 @ 08:11am


They wrote "I know it's over"

of corse!

Posted by mikhail on Saturday, 07.7.12 @ 20:03pm


The Smiths not being already in is kinda disgusting.

Posted by GFW on Monday, 07.29.13 @ 15:16pm


There's a pattern here: The Smiths, Joy Division, The Cure... C'mon! They ae MAJOR ROCK INFLENCES AND INNOVATORS! AND GREAT MUSICIANS!

Posted by BulmaPunkRocker on Sunday, 07.6.14 @ 22:43pm


The Smiths are at the top of the list (#1) on the FUTURE ROCK LEGENDS site, but are near the bottom (#12). If all you Smiths fans want to see the band inducted, you better place your votes there instead of here! Here, the list doesn't matter.

Posted by Barry on Monday, 11.24.14 @ 10:27am


The Smith's NOT inducted?...! This is beyond criminal. Perhaps a REAl RRHOF needs to be established, and we can leave the Lawrence Welk gang behind

Remember....Its about the Music FOOLS !

Posted by tgreen on Tuesday, 12.22.15 @ 15:09pm


I want to see them in, too. Posts like this do nothing to help the cause, though.

Posted by DarinRG on Tuesday, 12.22.15 @ 18:32pm


There appears to be a lot of bias in the selections over the years. Red Flag 1# Chic being nominated. Flag 2# Run DMC, ect.....

The fact that Artist such as the Smiths, Todd Rungren, Yes, Joy Division, and more importantly KRAFTWERK are not in by now is a travesty. All of these artist have made more an impact and influence on ROCK music that most of the inductees! Each one over these artist individually has made more an impact that most of the inductees combined.

I really don't care for the RRHOF that much but, occasionally seeing HOF inductees gets under my craw.

The Smiths have influence more rock musicians in the past 25 years than recent inductees did with their 25 yrs past their peak.

Posted by One Trick Pony on Monday, 01.4.16 @ 19:26pm


Yeah, let's not drag the Smiths, Joy Division and Kraftwerk into a lowbrow rockist argument.

Rockism has been done already and thoroughly mocked and debunked as a valid and respectable viewpoint. Starting a new generation of it isn't going to do anybody any favors.

Posted by DarinRG on Monday, 01.4.16 @ 19:44pm


I had no idea until tonight that Hans Zimmer and Johnny Marr playing together live is a thing. Seems that it's been happening for a few years now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WQvM4EM0lO8

Posted by DarinRG on Tuesday, 05.17.16 @ 05:03am


This just in, the Smiths are (were) a fantastic band. Hall or no hall, they made some of the best and original music of all-time.

Posted by Classic Rock on Friday, 09.16.16 @ 23:09pm


Absolutely - best band of the '80s!!

Posted by Tim on Saturday, 01.21.17 @ 11:56am


Leave your comment:

Name:

Email:

Comments:


Security Question:

Which letter is Springsteen's band named after?
 

Note: Emails will not be visible or used in any way, but are required. Please keep comments relevant to the topic. Any content deemed inappropriate or offensive may be edited and/or deleted.

No HTML code is allowed.




This site is not affiliated with the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame and Museum.